What’s really driving people back to the office?

Clue 1: It’s not the office.
Clue 2: It’s not collaboration either.

I recently had the pleasure of attending a session led by Hannah Nardini on WKSpace’s latest research* into why people are really heading back to the office. It was independent, candid, and refreshingly free of agenda, aside from the unspoken one we were all silently nodding along to: “What are we doing here?”

The session was easily the highlight of the whole event for me. Not just because Hannah is a brilliant speaker and a formidable presence in the industry, but because it was honest. No fluff. No posturing. And, as the only person in the room not solely working in the Workplace sector, I had the luxury of being a wholly objective observer.

Here’s what we know: average office attendance is creeping up from two to three days a week. What started as a gentle nudge has become more of a strategic shove, and in many cases, an outright mandate.

The go-to justification? Collaboration!

But if you’ve been paying attention (or have, say, a functioning BS detector), you’ll know that this doesn’t quite add up.

To be clear: I’m not downplaying the value of collaboration or face-to-face connection. Both are vital. What I am questioning is whether being in an office three days a week is the magic number required to achieve it.

According to the research, the real driver behind office returns isn’t joy, connection, or even decent coffee, it’s compliance. That’s the bit that makes me wince. In fact, 58% of people said they feel pressured or obligated to return. And 67% said they’re doing it because they believe it’ll help their career progression.

In other words: it’s not love, it’s fear.

Hannah doesn’t mince her words: “Offices are failing people.”

They’re too noisy, too distracting, too sterile. They don’t support hybrid work properly. 55% of people report feeling more stressed in the office. (The very place we’ve been told is designed to help us work better.)

So, with millions being spent on swanky refurbishments and workplace design, why this chasm between what people need and what they’re getting?

Maybe it’s because too many office designs prioritise collaboration zones at the expense of focus areas. Maybe it's because designing for neurodiversity and accessibility is still being treated as a bolt-on, rather than being baked in from the start.

Let’s zoom in on productivity: 29% of workers say they get more done in the office. But dig deeper and you’ll find it’s Gen Z propping up that stat - often because they don’t have a suitable setup elsewhere. For others, being in the office is simply about managing teams more easily in person. Fair enough. But still, it’s not exactly a ringing endorsement of the “magical collaborative hub” narrative.

So, what’s missing? A better understanding of user needs, right from the start. And that’s where I come in.

Yes, it costs money (I know - the horror), but it’s also an investment. In your people. In your culture. In your space, and ultimately, in your performance. With 20 years of experience in understanding humans - what they say they want, what they really want - I can help you get it right the first time. Which, spoiler alert, will save you a lot in the long run.

And just like a great workspace, I tailor everything to suit your needs and your budget.

Let’s talk.

*Research conducted Q1 2025, with 50,000 office-based private sector workers across the UK (predominantly London). Ages 18–67. C-suite excluded.

I’m done flirting; it’s time to commit

If you’ve come here expecting to read some salacious story about my dating life, you may be disappointed, as I thankfully managed to turn that aspect of my life around some years ago. Stick around though, you may find that what I have to say is actually more interesting... yeah, I know!

 I’ve long flirted with the notion of becoming a Workplace Strategist. The idea took shape when I embarked on an extended period of travelling, living and working as a digital nomad a few years prior to the time the world as we knew it took an unexpected dive headfirst off a cliff.

I lived and worked in 17 countries over 24 months, experiencing the full spectrum of Coworking and Coliving offerings at a time when the industry was still in its infancy. This experience led to my research study: #MyLifeAsADigitalNomad, which in turn opened the door to a shiny new world. I participated in a digital nomad conference in Gran Canaria, presented my insights at the Workplace Trends Research Summit in London and Future Spaces in Finland, amongst others. It felt new and exciting and was positively received. I made valuable connections with workplace strategists, academic researchers, interior architects, biophilic design experts and a whole host of other interesting people whose professions I had not known existed until that time. I feel very drawn to this community and its spectrum of skills that are vital to designing the workplaces of today and beyond.

Fast forward a few years and I’d navigated my way through a Pandemic, IVF and resulting parenthood. Like many others my business took a hit during this period, but I was able to keep afloat whilst also succeeding in leveraging my remote working and ‘workplace’ credentials to win a few small projects. It was still just a situationship however, and a challenge to build it into something more sustainable.

As the owner of an insight business, I’ve always felt it prudent to have one foot in the present and the other in the future. I’m not blind to the fact that I’m going to have to fight to stay relevant and desirable in an industry where it’s essential to have your finger on the pulse. I know some fantastic insight consultants in their 50s, 60s and beyond who are extremely successful, but I’m aware that in today’s harsh climate, youth and lower day rates are often valued over experience and wisdom. In the back of my mind I’m always thinking about my next step. This is where I find myself drawn back to Workplace Strategy every time...but why?

  1. I believe being able to work in an environment conducive to producing high quality work and that is aligned with our human needs should be a right not a luxury or a ‘perk’

  2. It’s a fascinating, evolving area that will require a great deal of love and attention in the coming years and I am willing to give that in abundance

  3. It’s a shift rather than a complete 180 so my skills and experience remain relevant

  4. It’s an area where I believe experience and wisdom are valued highly

Attending the Workplace Trends User Experience Conference earlier this month, learning about all the ground breaking and meaningful work that’s taking place in this sector, and meeting even more smart, forward thinking workplace professionals, cemented things for me.

So here we are. It’s time to make the statement out loud and be more than a little vulnerable. I’m here to embrace a new challenge. That’s right; I’m committing. I will remain faithful and loyal. I’m eager to learn and embrace each opportunity that arises. I will take any advice you have to offer.

OK, that wasn’t as scary as I thought it would be.

Edit: Whilst reviewing this piece an email pinged in my inbox from Jobgether, alerting me to the Top 100 Future of Work Leaders Report. https://jobgether.com/top-100-flexible-influencer. I sifted through, happy to see at least 10 professionals that I’ve met or worked with over the last 5 years. I don’t want to get too far ahead of myself, but wouldn’t it be nice...?

 *Watch this (work)space...*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Semiotics of Remote (3 min read)

Real world journalist Vs. desk-bound theorist

The following is based around a blog post that I wrote in 2018, and am now revisiting in light of the Coronavirus pandemic and its impact on our working practices. I’ve included the initial post as I believe it’s still so relevant, and have added to it to give it context in 2021.

Dig nom image.jpeg

January 2018 (Medellin, Colombia – month 11 as a digital nomad)

Remote. Remote. Remote. Remote. Remote.

Barely an hour goes by where I don’t hear this word being uttered, read it on a Slack post or see it somewhere in my immediate environment. I’m so used to hearing it that I almost don’t hear it anymore. Does that make sense?

Recently though, I’ve started hearing it again. And listening. I mean really listening. And what I’m hearing has started to clarify some things in my mind.

This past year I’ve heard many different people’s experiences of their remote working lives. It’s disappointing, but not altogether surprising that a significant proportion of employers have serious reservations about allowing their staff to work remotely. Some reject the idea outright and others find obstacles to place in the way.

I’ve tried to unpack this the best I can, with the help of the Remotes that I’m travelling with and others I’ve met along the way, and I hear the same concerns around trust, communication and collaboration raised again and again.

 As those who have followed my journey know, I’m currently 11 months into conducting a year-long ethnographical study into Digital Nomadism (working title: MyLifeAsADigitalNomad), and these are all themes that I’ll be reporting on in detail in 2018, so they are not going to be the focus of this piece, but what I do want to look at is what semiotic cues can be taken from the word Remote itself and how this can affect people’s perceptions and therefore their actions.

remote island.jpg

First off, here’s a snippet from the Oxford English Dictionary definition of Remote

Adjective: (of a place) situated far from the main centres of population; distant - Having very little connection with or relationship to.

 …and some synonyms from a brief Google search just to hammer the point home:

Irrelevant to, unrelated to, unconnected to, unconcerned with, not pertinent to, inapposite to, immaterial to, unassociated with, inappropriate to.

I think it’s fair to say that our residual definition of (and associations with) Remote sit at the core of people’s apprehension, and while there is positive evidence to show that the word is being used increasingly in our everyday lives, I feel that this is an issue that needs to be tackled head-on and I for one am willing to take up this gauntlet and run with it.

Before starting to write this piece, I sought the opinion of an experienced Semiotician who is a former colleague and current friend, and whose complex mind I admire greatly. He suggested that I “consider what the positive signifiers are of remoteness in the context of work, but what the negative associations are in terms of our cultural understanding…”, but in truth I struggled to find any historical references to the former.

On the whole, his thoughts and mine were pretty well aligned; “…the myths about slobbing around in pyjamas, not engaging fully with work, productivity dropping, too many (homely) distractions etc, and how we might signify proactivity to offset that assumption with activity signifiers…. greater use of email to declare work in progress and checking in for reviews etc. The stuff we habitually do to make sure nobody thinks we’re slacking off.”

Interestingly, his immediate associations are around working from home, whereas mine are generally intertwined with travel; clearly a product of him being a dedicated partner and father living outside of London, and me being a little more footloose and fancy-free.

The issue as I see it is that these negative perceptions are barriers to individuals and employers considering remote work as a positive step forward. Not only does this create resistance to a movement that is growing in popularity and momentum, but it also holds people back from exploring their full potential and becoming their best selves.

My experience of living as a Digital Nomad wholly contradicts the dominant/residual semiotic cues of Remote. Of course, every individual is different, but on the whole I see only good things coming from those who are free to live a more integrated work and personal life. A life full of richness, cultural immersion, flexibility, opportunity, gratitude and positivity. The world and how we connect with it and each other is changing, and that to me is exciting.

When all is said and done my friend and I agreed that it feels like there is a battle of opposing perceptions… one dominant/residual that focuses in on the negatives, and the other emergent/dominant that tries to articulate the positives. The challenge is that the negative signifiers are well established and understood, whilst the newer, less formalised positive signifiers are still evolving and coalescing to create a new set of semiotic codes. And so we are left with a question in our heads and in our hearts:

How do we neutralise the negative perceptions of ‘remoteness’ with powerful signifiers of ‘remote action’?


March 2021 (London, UK)

lockdown 2.jpeg

Zip forward 38 months (has it really been that long?!) to March 2021, and we find ourselves in an almost unrecognisable world, yet still struggling with the residual connotations of Remote.

Essentially, the pandemic forced many businesses to ‘go remote’ overnight, with varying degrees of success. Switching to remote working has allowed businesses that were previously office-based to continue trading, and tools like Zoom, Teams and Slack have helped make it possible. For some, it has been an eye-opening, perception-challenging, positive experience, however such a massively accelerated paradigm shift is not without its obstacles, these being:

1)    The need to become familiar with remote working tools, extremely quickly

2)    The lack of embedded remote culture

3)    The issue of not having an adequate remote working environment

If the above resonates with you, it may well be that you are still feeling the negative residual connotations of remote, and it’s hardly surprising given all that is going on right now. My belief is that no’s 1 and 3 are easily resolved, and no.2 is the only one we really need be concerned with.

And so, two dominant mind-sets are emerging from those fresh to remote working:

1)    The realisation that remote working is possible for them; they prefer this lifestyle and are looking to make a more permanent change. In this scenario Remote starts to shake off its negative connotations

2)    The frustration of not being physically present and around their co-workers, plus the annoyance of having to use Zoom for 8 hours a day, coupled with ‘homely’ disturbances, leads to a resistance to on-going remote working. In this scenario we see the residual connotations of Remote being reinforced

 It is a truth that technology evolves more quickly than humans do, so changing the culture of an organisation is not going to happen overnight. It requires time (and in this situation, experience, which is what many people are lacking right now).

Luckily, there are some of us who have been advocating this shift for years, as we see the full extent of life-enhancements it can offer and are well-placed to help organisations manage this transition smoothly, and for long-term success. If you’d like to know more about the bespoke services I offer, you can contact me on deborah@caminoinsight.com for an initial chat or have a look at my Remote by Default course outline at caminoinsight.com/remote.  

 If you’re still not convinced that Remote can have positive connotations for your organisation, just take a look at the many fully distributed organisations that pre-date the pandemic and chose the lifestyle proactively. They are the ones who have, on the whole, continued to function unhindered, and there is much we can learn from them.